Talk:Waddy

Australia: Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Waddy is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Etymology

The etymology section in this article is within the scope of the Etymology task force, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of etymology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EtymologyWikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics/EtymologyTemplate:Etymology sectionEtymology articles

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Shouldn't It Be Said

That the nulla nulla comes in different types: beak-headed, flat-headed, round-headed, and sphere-headed?

Article needs references and clarification

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article needs more references, for example for the assertions about the kinds of uses to which waddies were put, including in preparing ochre. It also needs to be clearer about the types of clubs which were called waddies, distinguishing them from leangles, lil-lils and others. The photo illustrating Arrernte (old spelling "Aranda") waddies includes a hooked or beaked one, in a style usually called a leangle, probably from a name lianggul (from the elements lia + -ang +-kul – "one having a tooth") given it by speakers of the Kulin language group of central and western Victoria. The other two resemble lil-lils, which I believe come from NSW. yoyo (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

In addition, the comment that one could split a shield seems redundant. Unless there is a source proving this it should be removed. 2001:8003:12FC:C100:608A:F2BB:C626:21DF (talk) 05:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why not use present tense. The wadi IS made. Instead of the wadi WAS made. past tense is a bad look.

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why not use present tense. The wadi IS made. Instead of the wadi WAS made. past tense is a bad look. 120.144.122.89 (talk) 00:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic