Talk:WURFL

WALL

Should we have a separate page/section on WALL? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterbu (talk • contribs)

That seems like a good idea. I may write that part. Time permitting... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Passani (talk • contribs)

Big parts of this page concentrate on the commercial WURFL offerings and resembles advertisement, more than information that you would expect to see on an encyclopedia. All of these should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.156.13.108 (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

There used to be relevant info about WURFL cloud, support for different platforms and integration with proxies and web servers. Someone had removed that, but it definitely belonged here (among other things it is not clear, by the same metrics, why all the stupid discussion about the nuances of the licensing was considered more relevat than what the tool actually is and does). Anyway, it only made sense to undo that removal and re-add the information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.72.140.160 (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

References

References have been added with citations for some claims. Is this enough to remove the "no references" tag? Sax1johno (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes. It's now {{Refimprove}}. -- Trevj (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

There are endless references (and in some case in-depth coverage) of WURFL in books and magazines. WURFL has been (and arguably still is) the de-facto standard in mobile detection. A huge chunk of the mobile community is using or has used WURFL (or at least os aware of it). It definitely belongs on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.122.156 (talk) 16:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)