Talk:WAGs Boutique

Article length

This article is far, far too long. There does not need to be more than a one-line summary for each episode. From the style of writing it looks as if someone working for the programme has written this entry. Other problems include the unecessary use of a headline for each contestant's name. Dancarney 13:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Does wikipedia really need such detail for a minor TV show ? -- Beardo (talk) 02:30, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Fans

I'll see if I can help here. Any other fans of the show about? Babs rox 15:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Split

Would it be better to make this the generic article for WAGs Boutique and create a separate one for Series One, seeing as there is expected to be a second series? Babs rox 17:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WAGslogo.jpg

Image:WAGslogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Tense and gossip

The article is phrased in the future, but surely the series has ended.

The article includes extra information, in particular about Heather Swan, which surely doesn't relate to the show, coming a year later. -- Beardo (talk) 02:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

I've updated the tense, and deleted the episodes section. It was unreferenced per WP:BLP, written in a highly unencyclopedic tone better suited to a fan blog, overly detailed, and in places was possibly libellous. Dai Pritchard (talk) 01:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)