Talk:Viticulture (board game)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
 | A fact from Viticulture (board game) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the board game Viticulture has a Mafia expansion set? Source: "The final three expansions are labeled "Tier Three" and are not meant to be added to the game together....Mafia - meh." Things of No Interest: Viticulture and Tuscany Review
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jonathan Strong (slave); see my DYK tracker
Created by Mindmatrix (talk). Self-nominated at 17:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC).
Article is new enough (12/10 creation), long enough, sourced and policy compliant. Earwig reveals no issues. Hook is short enough, interesting (Mafia always attracts hits -- no pun intended, but I'll take it), and sourced to Punchboard Media (reliable source?). QPQ completed. Cbl62 (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Cbl62: I was on the fence about that source; I used it because the author's name was attached (unlike some of the other articles on that site), it appeared free of bias, and the site appears to at least have some editorial oversight. (It's not a site I would typically use for a reference, though.) It was the only Tuscany review I found that wasn't a blog. Mindmatrix 14:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Understood. It didn't stop me from giving the approval tick, but we'll leave it to the promoter to make the final call. Cbl62 (talk) 14:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Cbl62: I was on the fence about that source; I used it because the author's name was attached (unlike some of the other articles on that site), it appeared free of bias, and the site appears to at least have some editorial oversight. (It's not a site I would typically use for a reference, though.) It was the only Tuscany review I found that wasn't a blog. Mindmatrix 14:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)