This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
I copied the background page of VirtualGL.SourceForge.Net. Yes, I know that's a bad thing, but I currently don't have time to edit it. If someone could wikify this page and remove all copyrighted wording (don't know what license the original page had) that would help. Jdm6415:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, this article definitely needs to be wikified. Also, since it was taken from the page it doesn't have NPOV. The license on the original page was CC, however it states we have to cite it as the original source. I'm adding a wikify template to the article, maybe that will help. Psychcf (talk) 01:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
There appears to be an unanimous opinion about the article: it needs some wikifying and/or revamping. What bothers me (it never fails) is that someone, who most probably doesn't understand the subject matter, inserted an offending tag about it not meeting the "general notability guideline" and needing to "establish its notability". The article, the effort to have created it, and the knowledge behind it (obviously beyond whoever inserted the obnoxious tag), deserve some respect. I've removed the tag. Regards, --AVM (talk) 23:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
