This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Vince Macaulay be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move the page to Vince Macaulay, per the discussion below. Actually, the article was originally at this title, and was moved by cut-and-paste. I have merged the edit histories. Dekimasuよ! 01:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Vince Macaulay-Razaq → Vince Macaulay — More common name, Google says "Vince Macaulay" -razaq=661, "Vince Macaulay-Razaq"=99, and in <first name> <last name> format. —SeveroTC 23:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Oppose. We should use the name that he says is his. I accept that the local papers always just say "Vince Macaulay", but we can make that redirect. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak support We should use what he is usually called, like Cat Stevens. It would be more useful, however, to have an account of the name change in the text. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support. The team website calls him Vince Macaulay. If there is compelling reason otherwise, please present it. Examples from Google alone are not enough — Bushitler gets many hits but is not an appropriate title. — AjaxSmack 04:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Outside references use only Macauley. We should follow them (see WP:PROVEIT). Cross porpoises (talk) 19:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Any additional comments:
In all such cases, continue to apply the general rule that Wikipedia uses the form of the name that is most common for referring to the person in question
In my reading, what the subject wants to be called is less important than what he is commonly called. SeveroTC 00:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Additionally, I made a typo in the reasoning, which made my argument of commonest name not make sense. I've corrected it to be "Google says "Vince Macaulay" -razaq=661, "Vince Macaulay-Razaq"=99". Sorry for any confusion on that. SeveroTC 00:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.