Talk:Villar Records

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Villar Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100327222609/http://pinoytunes.net:80/singleAffiliate.do?affiliateId=5 to http://www.pinoytunes.net/singleAffiliate.do?affiliateId=5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Villar Records Discussion

@Lemongirl942:, @MSJapan:, @Corkythehornetfan:, @Atlantic306:, @RioHondo: I do want this article to redirect it to Mareco Broadcasting Network article, since the article itself was been created by an IP user only. I do also want to nominate this for deletion, but first I need your opinion (especially MSJapan, since this time I think I really need his opinions to this article) with this matter. It doesn't seem to me that this Villar Records is not really fit to WP:NOTABILITY, and it does seem strange that a former senator is also owns a recording label center? I do see a promotional term here. What do you think? Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 10:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I've removed non-notable people from the article, which has shorten it. Though this isn't really my "area" of editing, I will change my !vote if others think it needs to be kept per guidelines (and I'm persuaded enough). Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 18:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

This is simply a sourcing issue, and who owns it is irrelevant to its notability. For a label to last for 66 years, that says something. Moreover, it was big enough to get an article in Billboard in the US in the 1970s, so I think that should do it, as it's a sourced claim to having two of the "most recorded" Filipino artists at the time, plus, if we cna source the first recording of the anthem, that's pretty good, too. MSJapan (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Keep is notable having coverage in reliable sources such as billboard, has a long history for a record label and has had at least 11 notable artistsAtlantic306 (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)