Talk:Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011

New Zealand: Politics / Law Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the New Zealand law task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The bill is a response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Hamed & Ors v. R ?

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I contest this phrase. If you look at the dates (see [1] and [2] you'll see that that it a response either to the dropping of the charges or to the un-suppression of the ruling, not the ruling itself. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The bill's explanatory note and the SC report make it clear that it is a response to the decision itself.--IdiotSavant (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Future Development

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This will eventually need an "aftermath and repeal" section detailing - any cases that are decided as a result of this law - repeal and replacement by Search and Surveillance Bill in 6 months - any political fallout --IdiotSavant (talk) 23:20, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic