Talk:Uwe Barschel
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Very bad, needs good overhaul
editThe "Death" section is basically a rehash of Ostrovsky's claim. But de:Uwe Barschel discusses several different theories, and Ostrovsky's is actually the weakest. It fits the evidence, but then again every major theory in this case "fits the evidence" - even a straightforward suicide does!
What's really problematic about Ostrovsky's claim is the "lured to Geneva" bit. According to de:, Barschel wound up there by accident:
"On October 8th, in a Gran Canaria holiday resort, Barschel asked for a flight to Zürich, to meet with someone. When told that the flight was completely booked, he asked for a flight to any other destination, e.g. Madrid and Geneva."
(trans. from de:, emphasis added)
If this is true, the only way to square this with Ostrovsky's account is to assume Barschel wanted to go to Geneva all along, but decided to obscure this by travelling via Zürich or Madrid and inventing the story of meeting a contact in Zürich. But why would he then take a direct flight to Geneva at all?
Perhaps the most damning evidence in favor of suicide is that the presumed killers did not make sure Barschel would actually die (by submerging his head for example). Neither do the "traces of force" amount to much (a hematoma where his head rested against the wall, which a simple convulsion would just as well produce). And it makes little sense to assume an elaborate murder plot, yet also assume that "indications that another person had been in Barschel's room at the time of his death" were not removed by the killer(s).
Yet there are also things that argue against a suicide - Barschel was involved in shady dealings, there are persistent rumors of illegal arms trades (and he died at a time when the German government was busy supplying Saddam with all sorts of "dual-use technology" - illegally). Witnesses died.
In short, this article needs to be very NPOV, allowing for a lot of theories to turn out to be the correct one. Because we really do not know what happened. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 22:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
I agree, and think the "conspiracy theories" section gives way too much weight to Ostrovsky, a source of externally dubious credibility. Unless people think otherwise, I'll trim this section down considerably in the next few days. Attack Ramon (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
There is also the conclusion of the toxicologist Hans Brandenberger who was involved in the pathological investigation, printed in the German newspaper "Die Welt". There he described the obstacles he had to overcome, such as destruction of obvious potential evidence by the genevan pathologist, like most of the urine and stomach content (which according to him is an unethical and very unusual thing to do for a pathologist) and a general lack of interest to cooperate with his investigation. He also criticized refusal of the pathologist to analyze possible metabolites because it was claimed to be irrelevant for the case. He managed to do this step anyway and ended up largely supporting Ostrovsky's account based on his results.
He maintains that the metabolites indicate that the substances were not given all at once - like officially concluded - but delayed and that Barschel was in no shape that he possibly could have taken the last 2 meds himself because he must have been immobilized by the first cocktail of meds, supposedly consumed dissolved in a bottle of wine about an hour earlier.
The lack of metabolites of the also found cyclobarbital in his urine indicates that someone else must have forced it down his throat after Barschel passed out and that it was just starting to act when he died, unlike the other substances. He also explains that he found the substance methyprylon, a drug marketed as "Noludar" in his urine, which is unusual considering it should be broken down in its metabolites by now, which leads him to his conclusion that it was given him shortly before his death, rectally.
Brandenberger also concludes that Barschel was pretty much beyond saving once the last meds were given because of the sheer amount of substances in his body and also in the way they were applied, even if someone would have found him in time and called paramedics.
http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article11107132/Das-Gutachten-im-Fall-Barschel.html --84.160.227.116 (talk) 10:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- English-language article dealing with Hans Brandenberger's claims: The Irish Times - Derek Scally - Mossad accused over 1987 death of German politician, 22 November 2010.
Uncited material in need of citations
editI am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 19:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|