This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy
Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
added a aftermath section which gives a brief update on how the OCBC functions today. I also briefly mentioned the current lawsuit going on which is trying to overturn medical marijuana in the California. Please feel free to edit if you feel this information shouldn't be here
I removed the tags looking for wikification, sections, and sources because I made some improvements. However, it still needs work. I would like to see a more detailed explanation of the Supreme Court ruling and an explanation of the what issues are still being considered by the lower courts. I would also like to see a little more context and information about the local politics and parties involved in the case. There is plenty of information in the links I provided. Lagringa08:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Stay by Ninth Circuit. Can anyone verify the fact that the Ninth Circuit issued a stay in this case pending the outcome in Raich v. Ashcroft? The stay should have been lifted by now. What has happened since? ---Axios02304:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
OCBC's web site has pdf links to virtually all the relevant court pleadings in this case. Looks like the stay's legit. Too bad the Ninth Circuit doesn't have free public access to its docket over the internet. ---Axios02305:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Links to medical necessity article. Someone had added links from this article to the "medical necessity" article. Since that article doesn't discuss the term "medical necessity" as it's being used here (as a legal defense to a criminal charge), I removed them. ---Axios02306:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
