This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
More detail on major policy initiatives in various periods of the Bureau's history.
Publications section could highlight some particularly important items, like its studies of child labor.
The Bureau was a major communications nexus for women's reform causes, especially between 1912-1940; it employed or corresponded with every important female reformer (and most important male reformers) in the US, as well as international ones. A list of its important employees would help us figure out which of them have (or need) Wikipedia entries of their own.
A Bibliography section of secondary and primary sources as a guide for further research.
13 years later I could add the same complaint, Cliotropic. Page is atrophic merely outlining history, mostly through the eye of the institution, not even showing organisation.--Wuerzele (talk) 13:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
