Talk:Unification of theories in physics
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Onceinawhile in topic Great unifications
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Great unifications
edit@Deacon Vorbis: this article, and the text you reverted at Newton's law of universal gravitation, are based on a large number of high quality sources. In case you have already looked at the ones in this article, see some more below:
- Fritz Rohrlich (25 August 1989). From Paradox to Reality: Our Basic Concepts of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press. pp. 28–. ISBN 978-0-521-37605-1.
- Klaus Mainzer (2 December 2013). Symmetries of Nature: A Handbook for Philosophy of Nature and Science. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 8–. ISBN 978-3-11-088693-1.
- Encyclopedia.com
All of these, and many more, use the exact terminology described in this article. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- This page is redundant with Theory of everything, which already describes the topic and its history in more detail. XOR'easter (talk) 04:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- The ToE is also known as the "final unification". None of the other unifications have been described as a theory of everything or final unification, either now or at original publication.
- This article is analogous to World war, and the Theory of everything article to Third world war (or armageddon).
- Onceinawhile (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- No, this article is analogous to Theory_of_everything#Historical_antecedents. XOR'easter (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Dictionary definition of “antecedent”: “ someone or something existing or happening before”.
- The subtitle you linked to is explicit that the other unifications are not the topic of that article. Onceinawhile (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- The concept of unification, by itself, isn't something I've seen discussed in physics as a concept unto itself. If you can find any reputable sources that mention this as a broad concept that's a part of physics - outside of pedagogical explanations building up to a Theory of Everything, I think that the page would be justified by itself. But I haven't seen it used outside of those cases in my own experience. For now, I've made it redirect to ToE. - carchasm (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Carchasm, thanks for this. I was not pinged so I did not see your edit. You are welcome to take this to AfD if you like. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- The concept of unification, by itself, isn't something I've seen discussed in physics as a concept unto itself. If you can find any reputable sources that mention this as a broad concept that's a part of physics - outside of pedagogical explanations building up to a Theory of Everything, I think that the page would be justified by itself. But I haven't seen it used outside of those cases in my own experience. For now, I've made it redirect to ToE. - carchasm (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- No, this article is analogous to Theory_of_everything#Historical_antecedents. XOR'easter (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)