Talk:Ultraman Zero

Ultraman Zero was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 17, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 September 2016 by reviewer Cerebellum (talk · contribs).

Tokusatsu Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tokusatsu, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tokusatsu on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TokusatsuWikipedia:WikiProject TokusatsuTemplate:WikiProject TokusatsuTokusatsu articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

GA Review

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ultraman Zero/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 04:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I recently failed Ultraman Tiga (character); the review is here. Unfortunately almost everything wrong with that article is also wrong with this one: too many fair use images, poor quality prose, too much inline Japanese and untranslated Japanese, an in-universe perspective, a harv error, at least one dead link. I also see at least one blog used as a source. This is not close to GA, I'm afraid, so I'm failing this immediately.

Some example of poor prose, just to be specific:

"whose known for his role"
"laid a huge impact on the audience"
"being all-red in color and lacked a Color Timer"
"it has become possible to show different expressions according to the angle"
"Although the mask was originally molded integrally with the head, Zero and Belial were structured out of plane"

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 04:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 6 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Js11323.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic