This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ulsda railway stop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
Maybe. I think WP:NFCC #1 is satisfiable, inasmuch as the station building was demolished in 1950. Free images might exist, but creating a new one isn't possible. That said, the station building is also depicted in this picture of Westerbroek, and that image might be free, depending on when it was first published. The lack of information about the images on that site is frustrating. Mackensen(talk)09:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
It might be worth contacting the webmaster of that site to see if they can give you any more information about the photographs, even where they sourced them from could help to identify the copyright status. I'll also ping WP:MCQ about this. Thryduulf (talk) 10:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your replies. I agree that criterion #1 seems satisfied. More information about the photo would indeed be helpful, but I find it doubtful that the Stationsweb site could provide additional details. I would like to go ahead and add the photo to the article, but I will first post the question on WP:MCQ as you suggested. – Editør (talk) 10:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply