Talk:Ulmus crassifolia

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ulmus crassifolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120331081433/http://www.sunshinenursery.com/SunshineNursery/Elm_leaf_beetle_survey.html to http://www.sunshinenursery.com/SunshineNursery/Elm_leaf_beetle_survey.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

irrelevant citations

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The citations numbered 3 and 4 are duplicates with different years. However, they have the same volume and issue numbers as well as title. Additionally, the publication that is being cited both correctly and incorrectly is irrelevant to this article as it is describing the species Ulmus ismaelis, but there is no mention of Ulmus ismaelis in this article. If the author wants to include information regarding U. ismaeli as it relates to U. crassifolia, then I can see reason to include it here. But in its current state, this article should not include these citations. By the way, the correct date for the citation is 1998. KShearer (talk) 21:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

additionally, there are several broken links that need to be fixed/deleted KShearer (talk) 21:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic