Talk:Ulawun
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
Ulawun was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delisted
editI have just delisted this article from GA, it is clearly not even close to GA citeria. It fits Start class best on the {{Grading scheme}}. --Seattle Skier (talk) 07:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, I am speechless that this was even listed, musta bypassed the review process, did it say when it was listed? IvoShandor 07:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- An October 25, 2005 promotion by Slambo, back then, this probably was pretty good for a Good Article, because despite being a stub, it appears completly referenced. When there's no nomination process, no criteria, and like maybe 3 or 4 other people just tagging articles which look good to them, this kind of thing happens heh. Homestarmy 03:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
26 June 2019 eruption
edita bit of interesting info here but it's rather current and likely to be updated before the end of the eruption, also hoping for something to appear in the nasa earth observatory EdwardLane (talk) 09:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)