Talk:USB mass storage device class

Latest comment: 3 months ago by FUZxxl in topic CBI and BBB

Mac OS 8.5.1 Driver Question

edit

Apple Computer's Mac OS 8.5.1 supports USB mass storage through an optional driver. Can anyone provide any more information regarding this driver? Nerobert (talk) 20:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

xbox 360, playstation 3, etc. mass storage

edit

I don't know about the others, but the Xbox 360 only works with the fat32 file system, unlike the other operating systems.

Hot unplug

edit

Does it matter if you unplug a USB mass storage device without "Safely removing hardware" or the like? What happens if you unplug one during a file transfer? I've never noticed any problems, but these kinds of problems are subtle — Omegatron 03:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

It does not matter if you remove it without "Safely removing hardware". Also if you unplug one during a file transfer the file will become corrupted, although I am not sure if it corrupts the original file. I definitely do not recommend unpluging it during a file transfer. 68.255.97.28 11:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

well, i unplug one after playing maple (i install it into my thumbdrive) and the next time i plug it in, the file is gone! the folder says it's empty, including my phone's backup! someone please help. Ragnaroknike 15:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

You definitely need to use "Safely remove hardware". The operating system mantains a cache, and if you remove the stick before telling windows to flush it (via safely remove hardware) you can corrupt the entire filesystem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.203.113.191 (talk) 16:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Windows 2000/XP uses Write Behind caching on removable media for some odd reason. Pulling the usb cable or even pulling the card out of the reader before making it "safe" is a very bad idea. It is in my experience Windows will write "most" of the data immediately, but last bits won't be written in much as a few minutes sometimes. Safeing it will cause the write cache to immediately and completely flush. Windows 98 doesn't use Write Behind caching on removable media by default and is generally safe the pull the usb after you "think" the data is written. 66.114.93.6 (talk) 12:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


To see a drive's caching policy in Windows XP, open Device Manager > right-click a drive and select Properties > click the Policies tab. -- Insterested (talk) 01:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect scale?

edit

Is the scale to the right of the first image correct, seems like a long device to me. Judging by the Quarter used in the previous versions of the image, the length should be just above 80mm instead of 100mm. Bergsten (talk) 12:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Limits ? Technical details ?

edit

What is the maximum supported device capacity ? Is the protocol based on SCSI (similar to ATAPI) ? Also other details would be welcome. --Xerces8 (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Generic driver

edit

What is a generic driver?. --Mac (talk) 08:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

No backport to Linux kernel 2.2

edit

The "Unix-like" section incorrectly states that "a backport to [Linux] kernel 2.2 has also been made". "Neither USB-Storage nor High Speed USB are supported in the 2.2 line of kernels." - According to www.linux-usb.org[1]. Although some general USB functionality was back-ported to Linux 2.2.18+ ; I believe that to be the source of confusion. Madman420 (talk) 02:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is a usb-storage driver since 2.2.18: http://lxr.linux.no/#linux-old+v2.2.18/drivers/usb/usb-storage.c
I've added it as a reference. --scgtrp (talk) 03:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Error in article regarding AutoRun

edit

Malware and inherent vulnerability

Since Windows's AutoRun feature works indiscriminately on any removable media, USB storage devices became

This is not true. Windows XP does not use AutoRun/AutoPlay on USB flash disks at all. And I believe Vista/7 also asks before starting anything. --Xerces8 (talk) 21:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • It does not use AutoPlay, but it continues to use autorun. Some malicious programs change autorun.inf so that double-clicking the drive, or right-clicking and selecting open causes it to run a copy of itself on the drive, which then performs the expected action.--195.194.111.196 (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reliability

edit

Having used various external USB drives on various PCs / operating systems I have *always* found them unreliable on large, long-running data transfers. By large / long-running I typically mean using something like rsync to synchronise changed data between disks, either both USB on the same computer, or both USB on different computers across ethernet or one USB external and one internal (IDE or SATA).

Without exception, various error messages and 'hangs' start to occur after a while and either the rsync fails on lots of files or else the transfer rate slows down enormously because of OS delays while waiting for time-outs or 'resetting' hardware.

I never experience such problems with two internal IDE drives.

The conclusion is that there is something unreliable about implementations of USB when used for large / long-running transfers. Whether it is inherent in the USB protocol, or ubiquitous across operating systems' implementations (Windows 2K / XP / 7; various Linux) the effect is the same - USB is not reliable for large / long-running data transfers.

Why is this protocol problem never addressed in USB reviews? Or discussed in articles about the protocol? Such failures with primary, internal disks would be intolerable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.113.26 (talk) 07:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Windows 98SE

edit

A forum member at msfn.org using the handle Maximus Decim has packaged the USB Mass Storage drivers from Windows Me into an installer for Windows 98 Second Edition English version. Other forum members have made versions for other language versions of 98 SE. 66.232.94.33 (talk) 03:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why is there a reference and external links to Linux drivers but it is a sin to add either type for Windows 98SE drivers? I want clarification of why one O/S is important but another is not?
A link to the Maximum Decim Generic USB Mass Storage Device Drivers should be included in this article, because Microsoft no longer support the operating system, nor did they include generic support.
SbmeirowTalk17:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Linux USB info

edit

https://www.technovelty.org/linux/what-actually-happens-when-you-plug-in-a-usb-device.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbmeirow (talkcontribs) 04:22, June 20, 2014‎

That's a good article, went ahead and added it as an external link. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 17:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on USB mass storage device class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on USB mass storage device class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

USB mass storage

edit

The USB that I am using is not being able to transfer file from the host. The USB file name is not showing up. 49.145.185.202 (talk) 11:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

CBI and BBB

edit

The article should cover the CBI and BBB modes and how they work. --FUZxxl (talk) 17:41, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply