Talk:USA-202
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USA-202 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article deals with a military black project.
Because of the nature of such projects, the most authoritative sources (any involved governments and defense contractors) may not even acknowledge its existence. The most reliable sources may be highly speculative. Please ensure that the article is well and reliably sourced and does not contain unverifiable information or vague predictions.For more details, see the black project working group of the military history project. |
Building a better encyclopedia
editYou want to help with building a better encyclopedia, eh? Proposing useful content for speedy deletion might not be the best way to go about it. (sdsds - talk) 08:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see it as useful. I contains nothing but an external link. Spares us your sassy remarks. --Cerejota (talk) 08:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have removed the speedy deletion tag, as the article does contain content other than links, etc, and therefore did not meet CSD A3. If you still feel this page should be deleted, please take it to AFD, and please try to keep discussion civil. Thanks --GW… 12:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
NROL vs USA
editDoes anyone mind if I move this page as soon as a USA designation is announced? It'll probably be USA-202, but they aren't always in series. The NROL designation expires after launch, so it would make sense to move the article when the satellite receives its operational designation. --GW… 03:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- That would be in-line with USA 193. When you do, be sure to leave a note on my talk page and I'll go on a gnoming run to change out the links. -MBK004 03:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Done. Although I prefer hyphenated designations, I moved it to USA 202 for consistency. --GW… 23:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on USA-202. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216180905/http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=%2Fwww%2Fstory%2F01-17-2009%2F0004956494 to http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=%2Fwww%2Fstory%2F01-17-2009%2F0004956494
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091119195612/http://www.ulalaunch.com/index_launch_info.html to http://www.ulalaunch.com/index_launch_info.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)