Talk:UEFA Euro 1996 qualifying

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Metufit in topic Qualification Summary

Seeding coefficients

edit

I don't even see any source for the method by which the coefficients were determined, let alone a source for those coefficients themselves. Can someone please find one before we re-add this info? – PeeJay 20:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If you do the math as I've done, the teams end up in each pot as listed. It was unlikely to be any other method since UEFA used the 'points per game' method for future tournaments. In addition, if you look at UEFA Euro 2008 qualifying as well as the 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA) they use the same 'points per game' method and the numerical coefficients are listed beside each team. I also added the qualification coefficients to Euro 2000, Euro 2004, and the 2006 World Cup simply based on what was already written in the articles. Thedefenceman (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Maybe so, but you still haven’t provided any actual evidence that the seedings were determined that way. – PeeJay 22:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
I was simply going on what was already in the article. Thedefenceman (talk) 22:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
I get that, I think what I'm suggesting is that we remove the unsourced content from the article, including the coefficient calculation. – PeeJay 10:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Based on your recent edits, it shows the teams split among six pools with no source, calculation method, or numerical coefficient value. If you decided to remove calculation method along with the numerical coefficient, then it would make sense remove the seeding pools as well because there would be no way to know how the teams were ranked and assigned to each pool. — Thedefenceman (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Qualification Summary

edit

I wanted to bring the idea of potentially bringing back the wider summary table simply because it's easier to read over the current one and more consistent with other UEFA qualification summaries

Previous version:

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Group 7 Group 8
 
Romania
 
Spain
 
Switzerland
 
Croatia
 
Czech Republic
 
Portugal
 
Germany
 
Russia
 
France
 
Denmark
 
Turkey
 
Italy
 
Netherlands
 
Republic of Ireland
 
Bulgaria
 
Scotland
 
Slovakia
 
Poland
 
Israel
 
Azerbaijan
 
Belgium
 
North Macedonia
 
Cyprus
 
Armenia
 
Sweden
 
Hungary
 
Iceland
 
Lithuania
 
Ukraine
 
Slovenia
 
Estonia
 
Norway
 
Belarus
 
Luxembourg
 
Malta
 
Northern Ireland
 
Austria
 
Latvia
 
Liechtenstein
 
Georgia
 
Moldova
 
Albania
 
Wales
 
Greece
 
Finland
 
Faroe Islands
 
San Marino

Current version:

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Group 7 Group 8
 
Romania
 
Spain
 
Switzerland
 
Croatia
 
Czech Republic
 
Portugal
 
Germany
 
Russia
 
France
 
Denmark
 
Turkey
 
Italy
 
Netherlands
 
Republic of Ireland
 
Bulgaria
 
Scotland
 
Slovakia
 
Poland
 
Israel
 
Azerbaijan
 
Belgium
 
North Macedonia
 
Cyprus
 
Armenia
 
Sweden
 
Hungary
 
Iceland
 
Lithuania
 
Ukraine
 
Slovenia
 
Estonia
 
Norway
 
Belarus
 
Luxembourg
 
Malta
 
Northern Ireland
 
Austria
 
Latvia
 
Liechtenstein
 
Georgia
 
Moldova
 
Albania
 
Wales
 
Greece
 
Finland
 
Faroe Islands
 
San Marino
Yep, fair enough. However, I don't think it needs to be quite so wide. I support making all the columns equal width, but it really doesn't need to take up the entire width of the page. – PeeJay 10:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

May you look difference? Metufit (talk) 17:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok. I am unterstand. Metufit (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Israel first time

edit

Israel were also included for the first time? Roeelo (talk) 23:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply