Talk:Typhoon Nari (2001)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by C933103 in topic is this article really important enough for level 5?
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
is this article really important enough for level 5?
editthere's cyclones out there with tens of thousands of deaths.. what is this one doing in level 5 vital articles BWludXM4 (talk) 00:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Definitely not. The other Level 5 vital articles are hurricanes Katrina and Maria, both hugely significant. It should be removed, not sure why it got added in the first place BWludXM4. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- I dont disagree with its removal but I think its worth bringing @C933103: as the editor who originally added it into this discussion.Jason Rees (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nari flooded the whole Taipei and left a mark in the city on prevention and mitigation of extreme weather. But reviewing it now, there are probably other more important articles that are more worthwhile to be in the list than this typhoon, even when considering only in Taiwan in 21st century, like sunflower movement C933103 (talk) 05:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- I dont disagree with its removal but I think its worth bringing @C933103: as the editor who originally added it into this discussion.Jason Rees (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Remove There are far more notable storms that should be vital articles over this one. NoahTalk 22:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC)