Talk:Typhoon Angela

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 49.144.52.215 in topic English

Minimum central pressure

edit

There are three different statements regarding Angela's minimum central pressure, two within the article itself of 872mb and 879mb, and the infobox at the side stating 910mb. Which of these is correct? --96.32.132.171 (talk) 11:37, 17 March 2010 (UTC) The 910 is correct as it comes from the JMA, the rest are unoffical ones.Jason Rees (talk) 11:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Move?

edit

Given that this is the most notable of the three Angelas, and there probably won't be any new ones due to the current names, I propose this be moved to Typhoon Angela. I realize the 1992 one did kill 49 people, which is why if we moved it, we could add a dab link to the top. But clearly, this Angela is the most notable, having killed nearly 1,000 people and it's a milestone in Philippine typhoon history. Any thoughts? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm for it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Me too. Nobody ever talks about the other Angelas. – Juliancolton | Talk 19:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merge?

edit

The article is incomplete. Unless someone can fill out the rest of the MH and expand the impact section, I think it can fit inside the season article just nicely. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 12:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oppose - the Philippine name was retired, and the storm killed over 900 people. Articles are allowed to be incomplete. They're called stubs. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 13:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
As it stands yes, but this can obviously be filled out really easily, so no need to waste our time merging it. YE Pacific Hurricane 14:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - We don't merge articles just because they're incomplete. This was a long-tracked and exceptionally deadly typhoon. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 22:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Angela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

English

edit

English 49.144.52.215 (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply