Talk:Type 69 tank
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Added more variants info. Main specs section replaced with T-69-II. The original T-69 didn't enter service and there's no point in listing it. Majority of T-69's exported were T-69-II variant, since T-69-III/T-79 were reserved for PLA use only.
Smoothbore
editThis needs a little clarification. Did the Type 69 and Type 69-I prototypes both have a smoothbore copied from the T-62? Was the idea abandoned when the tank went into production? —Michael Z. 2006-08-14 13:35 Z
- (comment deleted) dendirrek (talk) 17:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Albania
editAlbania never had the Type 69 in service, only the early Type 59. All tanks have been withdrawn from service. dendirrek (talk) 16:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
28 September image
editThe original website misidentified the tank as a T-55. My apologies.--Darius (talk) 16:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- No sweat. It's easy to mix these things up. Almost any time I identify a new photo, I have to double-check by comparing it to known photos. I've noticed that US military photos of any Soviet-legacy tank, and even some actual tanks in museums, tend to be labelled “T-55”. Regards. —Michael Z. 2008-09-29 16:42 z
Possible equivalent article similar to Tanks in the Spanish Army?
Operators- added the flags
editThis is just an edit note. I have added the flags for the Operators section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.198.255 (talk) 18:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)