Written by subject, no independent sources, not notable

edit

IMO this article should be considered for deletion. It is obviously written by the subject, and the footnotes link to his own websites and to non-noteworthy sources (no news articles from even a reputable local source). He misleadingly makes himself out to be some kind of noted intellectual (he is not a "leading proponent" of any sort of theology; has no scholarly training or publications, etc). At the very least should be shortened to a basic biographical entry that doesn't dishonestly present the subject as a well-known figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.112.253.12 (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply