Talk:Twin
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Twin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 20 May 2022. Further details are available here. |
Quaternary mention?
editI not only didn't see any mention of non-communal "quaternary marriages" mentioned in this article, I couldn't find a single mention anywhere on wikipedia. Could quaternary marriages be mentioned or even have its own article? I learned about it earlier today in the letter section of Popular Science and this was basically the only worthwhile web reference I could find outside of discussion about group marriages: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.115.130 (talk) 03:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Citation 19 is a dead link
edit— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.109.234 (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Done I have flagged the URL with |url-status=usurped. — Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 21:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: BIO 378 Developmental Biology
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 January 2022 and 20 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Uketbriana (article contribs). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uketbriana (talk • contribs) 03:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Types and Zygosity section
editI removed table added in 2016 by Gatorgirl7563. It contained no information not already found in article. Tables should help the reader correlate related facts, however out of 77 cells, 66 were "X" (which was not defined). 2 columns were completely "X", so served no purpose. I am assuming that Gatorgirl7563 thought that it would be expanded and clarified by other editors over time, but at only 14% filled in, took up a lot of space without adding clarification to the article. There were previous discussions on talk page to remove or improve. If someone wanted to create a comprehensive table that correlates all aspects of the different types of twinning, I would support that, but it should add information to the article by showing how their attributes compare and contrast. • Bobsd • (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)