Talk:Tungsten trioxide

This should somehow be merged with Tungsten oxide --BjKa 13:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

i just proposed a merge between the two, this and tungsten(III) oxide. they should be merged because they are on the same topic.Arc88 03:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

To clear up the various misunderstandings, I created tungsten oxide to be a disambiguation page, where all tungsten oxides are listed, pointing out the various names of the oxides. And it is Tungsten(VI), not Tungsten(III). Wim van Dorst (Talk) 22:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC).

Requested move

I recommend this article to be moved in line with all other tungsten oxides, following the naming style recommended by the Chemicals wikiproject in their styleguide for articles on chemicals compounds. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 23:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC).

Support, conform Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Style guidelines#Use of Stock nomenclature, and to avoid confusion with W2O3. Markussep 16:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

This article has been renamed from tungsten trioxide to tungsten(VI) oxide as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 16:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Citation for properties

I don't see a citation for properties like density, melting point, and boiling point in the Chembox sidebar. Perhaps these values all come from the first reference, Handbook of Inorganic Chemical Compounds? I don't have access to that book, but if anyone can confirm I'm happy to add the citation. Celia Cunningham (talk) 12:31, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

WO₃-Monomer

Hi User:Hoang1032006, thank you for your work on Tungsten trioxide. You have included a figure of WO₃ as a monomer, File:Tungsten-trioxide-(monomer)-3D-balls.png. Do you have any literature on the structure of this form, because it indicates double-bonds between tungsten and the oxides? Also, the compound is a solid, with a crystal structure (shown in the article) that does not feature the WO₃ monomer (but WO₆ octahedra). So, unless you have a good reference for the monomer, I would remove this file from the article. Furthermore, please keep the lead of the article shorter - the reactions should be in the body of the article, the start is only for the most important infos included in the article below. Thank you! --!nnovativ (talk) 12:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)