Talk:Treaty of Fort Niagara

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 02:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Split

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This article should be split, with one article per treaty. Thoughts? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 20:51, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sounds reasonable. When will you be making the split? Op47 (talk) 17:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

On second thoughts, when I tried to do the split, I realised the sections wouls not make viable articles as they stand. Mainly due to lack of references. I also discovered a 3rd treaty that had been commented out. I uncommented that treaty and replaced the split tag with a more appropriate tag.Op47 (talk) 15:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

vandalism

Repaired vandalism of intro by 66.207.116.198.

Add topic