unusual formatting

edit

i was looking through this article and noticed some unusual formatting in the history section, which appears to have been intended as a named list.

how exactly would i go about fixing this unusual formatting while going with the original intent of the editor? 216.100.95.82 (talk) 18:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Be bold and go ahead to fix them than having someone to do it. 2001:EE0:4BC2:15B0:49A4:5AB0:3C6E:D99E (talk) 11:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I noticed this as well and also unsure how to fix this. I think the only two options are either splitting the "bullet points" into a group of headers, or just getting rid of them entirely and trying to just make it flow together as one big historical group of paragraphs. I might try my hand at it later when I'm out of my work meetings Myforce2001 (talk) 13:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Missing British engineer Eric Arthur Johnson

edit

There's no mention of British engineer Eric Arthur Johnson. There's enough photos, books and patents to confirm his involvement in helping touchscreen technology. Do not mistake his identity with other Eric Arthur Johnson in Wikipedia or business.

Photos i found: http://www.computer-timeline.com/timeline/eric-arthur-johnson-touch-screen/

Patents: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3482241A/en

Book (originally physical): https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/el_19650200 184.88.43.21 (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Actually, mr. Johnson is mention in the history section. The Banner talk 16:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply