Talk:Top Deck (drink)

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Top Deck Shandy

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The ultimate name for a non-alcoholic drink or a pub shandy that was more lemonade then “brew”. 164.39.136.228 (talk) 19:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Marketed to children?

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Current revision claims that

Top Deck was a low alcohol shandy drink available in a variety of flavours and marketed to children [my emphasis]

The referenced BBC article never actually claims that it was "marketed to children". In fact, it says little about Top Deck itself beyond a passing mention

Corona limeade. Idris lemon squash. Top Deck shandy. Strawberry-flavoured Cresta.

If you spent your childhood in the UK in the 1960s and 1970s, these and many other soft-drink brands of the era will immediately summon up a great frothy wave of nostalgia.

Well, I vaguely remember seeing Top Deck on sale as a child during the 80s. Maybe some kids *did* buy them back then? But that's very different from claiming that Top Deck was specifically marketed towards them...!

I've noticed someone else claim this too, but they may well have been mis-remembering or going by this article, and we should be wary of circular references *if* we've been the ones responsible for propagating misinformation in the first place.

Ubcule (talk) 14:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic