Talk:Tom Bingham, Baron Bingham of Cornhill

Learn more about this page

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed a claim that as president of the supreme court, Bingham will again be subordinate to the "Lord Chief Justice" — how can a UK court be subordinate to an English one? Or will there be a new Lord Chief Justice of the UK? I can't find any reference to it in the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Doops 05:42, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Constitutional Reform Act designates the Lord Chief Justice as the head of the entire judiciary,the Law Lords being only one part of the judiciary.It is the LCJ,not the head of the "higher" court,who replaces the Lord Chancellor as the senior judicial figure.--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 14:35, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your promptness. A few points:

the Lord Chief Justice of Enlgand and Wales can only, naturally, be the head of the Judiciary of England and Wales. I don't think the new supreme court is part of that Judiciary, since it serves the entire UK!
even if, as an Englishman himself who is a judge, Lord Bingham is somehow a "part" of the English judiciary (while his supreme court colleagues from Scotland remain a "part" of the Scottish judiciary), what would it mean to say that he is subordinate to the Chief Justice? What actual authority would the LCJ have over him?
was his move from LCJ to Law Lord really "unprecedented"? I immagine it has probably occurred quite often, in fact. I mean, I don't know anything about it; but it would seem logical, certainly.
I removed the unfair and unencyclopedic reference to a "miscalculation."

Thanks. Doops 18:40, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The past career movement has been entirely in the Law Lord to LCJ direction,in the case of anyone holding both positions.(Lord Russell of Killowen in 1894,Lord Lane in 1980,made that move).As far as the current Government is concerned,they have no problem with the LCJ being the head of the judiciary.I gather he would control the Supreme Court's budget.As far as the "miscalculation" goes,I believe that Lord Bingham assumed that future reform would look at the judiciary and the role of the LCJ the way you do,and like you,he was wrong.--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 19:01, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi. You still haven't explained the whole England/Wales vs. the-UK-as-a-whole thing. (We are talking about the LCJ for England & Wales, right? As I understand it, there's also an LCJ for Northern Ireland and a "president of the court of session" for Scotland.") Please point me to the section of the act which says that the new UK supreme court will somehow, bizarrely, be part of the English-and-Welsh judiciary. Doops 15:03, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain]] has ever since the Union been the seniormost figure in the UK judiciary,not just English (Wales being mentioned was,as noted in the article,an innovation of Lord Bingham,just as the title Lord Chief Justice of England rather than Chief Justice of the Court of King's Bench was a sop to the vanity of Sir Edward Coke).His judicial primacy is transferred by the Blairite act to the Lord Chief Justice,not to the senior Law Lord,never mind that the Law Lords hear appeals from the LCJ's decisions.--Louis E./12.144.5.2 15:35, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Again, could you please point me to a reference within the actual text of the act itself? Thanks. Doops 20:51, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Once again: could you please point to an actual citation within the act? Doops 06:59, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have removed references to Lord Bingham being junior to the Lord Chief Justice of Engalnd and Wales. As per Part 2, section 7, subsection 4 of the act, which does not list the new UK Supreme Court as a court being in the jurisdiction of the LCJ AdamCarden 18:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tom Bingham v. Thomas Bingham

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I would like to know why is this page titled "Tom Bingham, Baron..." instead of "Thomas Bingham, Baron..." (currently a re-direction). It appears odd to me to use a nickname in a formal title (I would have accepted if this article is named outright as "Tom Bingham" without the peerage title), and the main page does refer to Lord Bingham's full title as "Thomas Bingham, Baron...". Does anyone know why? --Pkchan 12:36, 18 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Moved. --Pkchan 14:24, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Thomas Bingham, Baron Bingham of Cornhill. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Thomas Bingham, Baron Bingham of Cornhill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic