This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
It seemed to jump around a bit (going from redevelopment to use as a venue in the same paragraph, then the next paragraph talking about development again, then a few more paragraphs about events and filming locations). Seemed more logical to have the development in one section and all else in another.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
opened in 1989 (...) was forced to close two years later. The shops closed one after another and i believe some were never occupied at all, but the shopping centre remained open for many years. It was similar to other developments at the time like Canary Wharf, where they kept the escalators running although all the shops stood empty. --92.201.160.120 (talk) 13:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
