Talk:Title 47 CFR Part 15

What's the quote?

What does the quote actually say, anyway? All I've read was just *about* it.

I think that it is mandatory for all devices to "accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation" so that in case of a national crisis like a natural catastrophe of something else like a nuclear attack the government can send out some sort of really powerful crazy warning to more people. Mabey its kinda like when cingular phones get really to speakers and they are ringing they mess with the sound. I also believe that a yeti is living in my basement. LOL ....no but really Part 15 of the FCC Rules.....think about it

This is just another example of a single case of poor use of the English language being propagated extensively. I believe that what should have been written is the following:

This device *must* not cause harmful interference, and this device must *sustain* any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.245.32.2 (talk) 18:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

unlicensed communication devices

The ISM band article claims that "Part 15 Subpart B contains the rules for unlicensed communication devices". However, this "Title 47 CFR Part 15" article claims that "Subpart B deals with unintentional radiators --- devices that are not designed to produce radio waves".

Is this a contradiction? --68.0.124.33 (talk) 15:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

No limits?

There's no mention of the spectral limits! I think this would be interesting so readers could actually see the signal strength limits used in EMI testing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon.irwin (talk • contribs) 20:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Alessandra diem

I am waiting on Omaha, Ne judge w. Thompson to decide weather or not I can have visits with my daughter who resides in Omaha, NE with her father Stephen P Murray. Thank you Alessandra 2601:581:C001:1E00:6C28:3FA8:9C99:7E1C (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)