Talk:Tim Zoehrer
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Rich Farmbrough in topic Pending changes
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Tim Zoehrer be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Bowling, Tim?
editI'm sure I once read that Zoehrer topped the (unfiltered) English First Class bowling averages due to his contributions in tour matches, possibly during the 1993 Ashes series. Can anyone verify or source a reference? DublinDilettante 01:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Nah, I remember now; he had the best FC average among Australian bowlers on the 1993 Ashes tour. 12 @ 20.83, compared to Warne's 75 @ 22.61, according to Cricinfo. Not sure if this historical quirk merits inclusion in the article? DublinDilettante 03:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Pending changes
editThis article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
 | Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC).