Talk:Tiger barb

Fishes Mid‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aquarium Fishes High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aquarium Fishes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Aquarium Fish articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Aquarium FishesWikipedia:WikiProject Aquarium FishesTemplate:WikiProject Aquarium FishesAquarium Fishes
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The references on this article are done completely wrong. I am a little rusty on Wikipedia, but i will try to figure out how to do it right. --Mynameisnotpj (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Which fish is this article about?

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Puntius tetrazona or Puntius anchisporus? Whoever wrote the introduction seems to think that it is about P. anchisporus, while the Taxobox is talking about P. tetrazona. All the photos are, if the introduction is correct, of P. tetrazona and P. tetrazona page redirects to this article. If this is about P.s tetrazona, then the introductions needs to be rewritten. - Kat (talk) 17:13, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fish with a "pecking order" like B. tetrazona are not "schooling" fish, but shoaling.--Wetman (talk) 04:49, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unsupported claims

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Many facts throughout this article are stated without any sources. The article itself seems unbiased but the facts can be misleading since there is nothing to back them up in the references page. This is especially noticeable in the commercial relevance section. Making sure to include references after each claim will help strengthen the information. Hawksbill36 (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic