Talk:Through the Wire

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleThrough the Wire has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 26, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
November 6, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

track release date

edit

the track was actaully written, back in 2003 or earlier, but officially released in 2004. i remember an interview with him saying that i also remember hearing it on an underground station back in 2003 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.185.78 (talkcontribs)

Yeah it was recorded in late 2002. Spellcast 23:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Failed GA

edit

According to the Manual of Style, and the six good article criteria, this article was quick-failed because:

  • Overall:
  1.  =6
  2.  =4
  3. Fail
  • Well written?:
  1. lead sections  
  2. layout  
  3. jargon  
  4. words to avoid  
  5. fiction  
  6. list incorporation  
  • Broad in coverage?:  
  • Neutral point of view?:  
  • Stability of the article?:  
  • Images?:  

Thank You. --Macys123 21:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Another GA review

edit

Woah, that one above was odd...anyways, I'm passing :) Just a few notes to improve.

  • The image could do with an expanded fair use rationale.
  • An image from the music video would be nice
  • "the track was nominated for Best Rap Solo Performance but lost to Jay-Z's "99 Problems"" - Don't use "lost"
    • I don't think "lost" is the best word in this context - use "But Jay-Z's "99 Problems" won the award" etc...I dunno, I just don't like the word :) — H2O —  22:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Rename "Credits" section to "Personnel" and add a ref for it, if possible (can just cite the album)

If you have any questions/comments, leave a note on my talk page. Cheers, — H2O —  09:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, — H2O —  09:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 19:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tribute Cover deletion

edit

I think that deleting the mention of the tribute cover is unnecessary. Music is ever evolving and this article is about ONE song and the artist's personal story regarding the circumstances of an accident and overcomming the obstacles faced when one has their jaw wired shut. I think therefore that any other artist (singer) who has their jaws wired shut and perform this song, their's would be an obviously applicable mention in this article. IF this article were about Kayne West it may not be appropriate, but THIS article is about a song, car accident and wiring shut of jaws. I say it stays. out of town, don't want to put my info on hotel computer, sorry wikians! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.105.239 (talk) 00:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Writing credits

edit

I'm looking at the liner notes for The College Dropout right now, and Kanye West does not have a songwriting credit for this track. Is it because it's a freestyle over an unaltered (albeit sped-up) beat? It says:

Through The Wire
(D. Foster, T. Keane, C. Weil) (BMI)
"Through The Wire" contains a sample from the Chaka Khan recording "Through The Fire".

Any thoughts? The article should probably be amended.
Ulmanor (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I found a source to cite and have amended the article.
Ulmanor (talk) 19:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Through the Wire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Through the Wire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Through the Wire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply