This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There is some confusion here. Howard's daughter Dorothy, married to Edward Stanley, is given three parents (she's listed under both of his wives). In Stanley's article she is this Howard's grand-daughter, the daughter of his son Thomas Howard, which seems more likely to me (going by their ages). Also the relationship between Agnes Tilney and Catherine Howard (Queen consort) is incorrect. It's all confusing when they all used the same names over and over again, from generation to generation, and even within generations, eh? I'll try and check into and fix this soon as i get time. Lindsay H.08:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thomas was created Earl of Surrey in 1483 but lost his title in 1485. The box at the bottom of the page does not reflect the fact that he was stripped of his title in 1485 and did not get the title back until 1489. Can someone rectify this? -- Lady Meg (talk) 22:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply