Talk:Thomas D'Alesandro Jr.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Maryland: Baltimore Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Baltimore Task Force (assessed as High-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Ordering of Offices

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As structured, the article seems to give greater weight to D'Alesandro's time in Congress than as Mayor. This seems an odd decision especially as he, clearly, thought the latter position more important or he'd not have run for it and then resigned from the House having secured it. Unless there are objections, I propose to modify it thus. Czrisher (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Attempted to embarrass"

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Seems a little editorial to me. Mathguyjohn (talk) 20:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'll try to rewrite this section to be more neutral. Removing some of the loaded language, including references to neo-Confederate ideology would help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richiebful (talk • contribs) 20:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reference now behind paywall

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Reference 5 is a dead link. The new version of the 1954 article is behind a registration wall.You have to give up an e-mail address to read past the first two paragraphs here:

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860626,00.html

I don't know how to fix this. Changing the dead link to the above does not lead to the first sentence of the Political campaigns section. I got a connection-timeout when I tried to register. The content is important, but is now unverifiable until https://secure.customersvc.com gets fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpfeil (talk • contribs) 23:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic