Talk:Third-party grading

Latest comment: 9 years ago by R&BpopROCK in topic NPOV dispute - Impact

NPOV dispute - Impact

edit

The text beginning with "Third Party Grading was created for the sole purpose..." (third paragraph) appears to be written with a strong POV biased against Third Party Grading services. Text like "scourge", "laughs all the way to the bank", and "purposely misgraded" imply ill intent on the part of the Third Party Grading services. These paragraphs need to be rewritten from a neutral point of view, neither biased against nor in favor of the grading services which are allegedly doing these acts. Additionally, these claims need to be backed up with verifiable citations from a trusted and accepted source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.168.59 (talk) 06:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done.--R&BpopROCK (talk) 00:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Small edit

edit

Under the "Impact" heading, there was a misspelling. It read "vertain," which I assumed to mean "certain." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.40.186 (talk) 05:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply