Talk:Theatre productions of Dan Leno

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured listTheatre productions of Dan Leno is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starTheatre productions of Dan Leno is part of the Dan Leno on stage and record series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on September 4, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
February 25, 2013Featured list candidatePromoted
March 18, 2013Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Keeping the trivia out

edit

Firstly this is just a list. This is not a replacement for content in the Leno article. There was so much info, that it would have been difficult to keep good quality prose if I were to mention all pantomimes in the Leno pantomime section and it would have become borderline repetitive...Next Leno starred in...Next Leno starred in. ...Next Leno starred in etc. That's not to say I will not write about them in the Leno article, because I will. I know not all pantomimes need to be mentioned in the Leno article, but this way ALL characters and shows get a mention, leaving the more important and prominent performances to have a mention in the Leno article itself. Any thoughts? -- Cassianto (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quite right. Leno's main article should only discuss his major productions. This list should be as complete as you can make it. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Separate section for reference

edit

Would it be better to separate the reference and give it its own section? The reason is because some of the notes do not conform to the reference given. The extra reference I am adding is to show the reliability of the notes. I know this is given at the bottom of the table by Anthony, but I didn't want to rely simply on one source alone. To me, it is tidier giving the ref its own section. At the moment, the Anthony ref proves the play was in existence and so would just cover that fact alone but he does not state what is in the notes. Separating the reference would indicate the ref was for the entire column as opposed to being about one particular cell. -- CassiantoTalk 13:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand the question. Which "reference"? Could you try to clarify what you are asking? Can you give an example of another list article that does what you are thinking of? As usual, I would ask you to please slow down. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

This is a list of all the legit theatre productions (that is, NOT music hall appearances) of Leno. Several of the productions listed are NOT pantomimes, and I suspect that this list is missing some, if not many, of Leno's non-pantomime productions. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Repeated information

edit

Style questions:

  • Should repeated names be bluelinked more than once? Theatre names? Genre names? What do other FA-quality lists do?
  • Should people's names be repeated in full? For example, if Augustus Harris is named, why not just say Harris the second time? -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
If the table is sortable then the names should be in full and the links repeated. If a reader changes the order by sorting, then the first link (or name) will change to something unlinked or incomplete. Where the full names or links are repeated then this problem is overcome. - SchroCat (talk) 07:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
OK, thanks for this explanation. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Theatre productions of Dan Leno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Theatre productions of Dan Leno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply