Talk:The Simpsons season 30

Article or redict?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello, with the User:JE98 we have a "edit war": about this page. Do you think we have an article about the 30th season? Article or redict? P.S. The page ‪The Simpsons (season 30)‬ has been reviewed by User:JTtheOG‬ --Patriccck (talk) 15:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Voting was end.

Comments

@Patriccck: I apologize if I you think I am edit warring with you. The reason I am redirecting the article is because it is not fully developed and the information with unscheduled episodes is already on the episode guide. In addition, "Bart's Not Dead" has not been confirmed as the season premiere. JE98 (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@Patriccck: Never mind, it actually was confirmed in an article. I will agree to keep the article but the guide has to only have scheduled episodes only, not unscheduled episodes. Sound fair? JE98 (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@JE98: Yeah it sounds fair. Do you edit the article to the ideal form? --Patriccck (talk) 19:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Votes

Article --Patriccck (talk) 15:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Redirect JE98 (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

• Redirect - sourcing at least at present isn't sufficient. We can all afford to wait another month for there to be high quality RS to turn this into an article. Best, Barkeep49 (talk)

The end

Talk is ended

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lets Make This An Article please

It would really help.2601:447:4101:41F9:2000:DDE7:28C9:A3C2 (talk) 22:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Article

Why is this an article? How does one episode table make a valid article, and why can it not be included at the List of Episodes? No, "previous seasons did it" is not a valid reason, we should be keeping Wikipedia to a higher standard than this. -- Alex^TW 23:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

I agree, no reason for this to be its own separate article. Matt14451 (talk) 06:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Pinging users who contributed to above discussion - @Patriccck: @JE98: @Barkeep49: Matt14451 (talk) 07:14, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

I really do not see why this is such a big issue. The season just started, so the article is not expected to be too big. However, at the same time, I will agree that it could be expanded. JE98 (talk) 23:04, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

@JE98: You failed to answer the questions. Why is this an article? How does one episode table make a valid article, and why can it not be included at the List of Episodes? If it's not expected to be big, then it's not expected to exist, and thus should only be expanded in the draft space. -- Alex^TW 16:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

AlexTheWhovian this article looks like what a stub version of a TV season looks like. Given the numerous Simpsons articles which are GA or FA I have no issues with this article in its present form. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

When did we start promoting stubs as good and necessary? Sad times, sad times... -- Alex^TW 01:50, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Can Anybody Explain Why TV By The Numbers Changed

It now is back to 3.34. I actually saw 3.39 when I made the edit. Maybe it was an Internet troll hack. I don't know.68.47.64.121 (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2018 (UTC)