Talk:The One with the Cast of Night Court

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Xtzou in topic GA Review
Good articleThe One with the Cast of Night Court has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe One with the Cast of Night Court is part of the 30 Rock season 3 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed
July 29, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:The One with the Cast of Night Court/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 22:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I am reading the article and will be adding comments. I did a little copy editing to try to get rid of wording like "which resulted in" etc. as usually that is not the best wording. Forgive me if I screwed anything up and feel free to change what I wrote.

Plot

  • "To help Jack, Liz gets Claire to abandon her plans with Jack and instead go out nightclubbing with her and Jenna." Does this mean "abandon her plans" to kill herself, or what?
  • "Wanting to see Kenneth happy again, Tracy Jordan (Tracy Morgan) gets actors Harry Anderson, Markie Post, and Charlie Robinson from the television show, Night Court" - What is meant by this? How did he get them?
    • Tracy asks Kenneth what is wrong, as he is displeased with page uniforms. He tells Tracy that many things around him have gone wrong, including the fact that he didn't get to see the Night Court wedding between Harry and Christine, as the show didn't get a tenth season. So, wanting to see Kenneth happy, he calls the cast of Night Court to make Kenneth happy.
  • "finds out that he can watch the Night Court wedding between the Anderson and Post's characters, Judge Harry Stone and Christine Sullivan, before the show is canceled by the network." - Was it canceled by the network before the Night Court wedding? Or does this take place in the past, before Night Court was canceled?
    • The wedding never happened because the show didn't get a tenth season, which was suppose to be a wedding between the two characters. No, Kenneth writes a script in which he can watch the wedding between them.
  • "Tracy tells Kenneth that he added that part in the script as he complained to Kenneth's superiors to bring back the old uniforms, which makes Kenneth happy." - Could you make this clearer? Also, why is there such a concern about making Kenneth "happy"? Is there a way not to repeat this?
    • How "clearer"? Tracy tells Kenneth that he can go back to wearing his old uniform, as he complained to his superiors, which pleases Kenneth to the fact that he can go back to wearing his old page uniform.

Production

  • Is it necessary to name the other TV show that Jennifer Aniston was in? Much of this para on the subject of Aniston seems to stray from the topic. Isn't it irrelevant to the TV show?
    • Removed.
  • "What are 'mad skills'? And why so many quotations about Aniston.
    • IDK, I can't interpret what Fey says, and removed.
  • "In the first scene, Liz and Jenna recall their wild nights with Claire, including when Jenna and Claire danced around an opened fire hydrant, while Liz tells them that she does feel safe." She feels safe why?
    • She does not feel safe.
  • "They also remember when they crashed a Polish wedding, in which Claire is seeing dancing around a group of men, while Liz gets on stage saying that if they do not hurry up their cab will leave them behind" - The second sentence in a row with "while" it it. Can you rephrasing these sentences so they don't have "while"?
    • Removed the second "while".

(will continue to add comments) Xtzou (Talk) 22:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • You have done a very good job of fixing the problems. Nice work!
  • A very nice article. I made a few more copy editing changes that I hope you will correct if they change the meaning. Xtzou (Talk) 14:52, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!  

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 15:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply