Talk:The Medieval Review

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Open Access

The Medieval Review is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Does it deserve a page?

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am not hot on this topic, I started the page for only one reason: I wished Wikipedia could have told me what it was. If I search for something and I have to multiple searches, I build a Wikipage, so other people can get that info. So I think the page is needed, and it appears in books here, here and here among other places. So I say keep the page, it is notable. History2007 (talk) 14:28, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree it deserves a page--it looks like a useful and open access reference that others can use to improve other wikipeida articles. Jaldous1 (talk) 00:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic