Talk:The Junipers

Untitled

Please could someone explain why this page is liable for speedy deletion & explain why this article could be deemed as being insignificant. Thank you --Gardengary74 (talk) 11:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

This issue is whether the article is WP:NOTABLE as per Wikipedias standards to do this it needs to be source to {{WP:RS|reliable]] 3rd party sources independent of the subject. Gnangarra 12:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

3rd party sources to support this topic include the following links:

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:avfrxzy5ldke

http://www.thejunipers.com/about.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/shows/marc_riley/tracklisting_20070622.shtml

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00ltlry

http://www.thejunipers.com/news.html

http://www.thejunipers.com/gigs.html

http://www.thejunipers.com/reviews.html

http://rateyourmusic.com/artist/the_junipers --Gardengary74 (talk) 15:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

The band's own website is by definition not a third party source. The Allmusic and Rateyourmusic pages shows only that they exist, not that they are notable. That leaves only the BBC links, both of which are simply tracklistings and do not discuss the band. They may still be notable, but these sources don't establish it. Hairhorn (talk) 16:08, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Ampersand ad nausea

&&&&&&&&&&&&&& — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.108.13.133 (talk) 00:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

• ad nauseam (ad plus accusative)