Talk:The Easybeats
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Easybeats article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editthey formed in 194? looks like the date got truncated. could somebody who knows fix this? clarkk 10:17, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The first paragraph does not read well. Pop band; rock and roll band; rock act; international pop hit - as opposed to international hit (The Seekers) - what exactly is the best ?!
The article is full of good intentions. But it needs better shape, a brief discography, better wiki linkage, and a decent editor. I do not know enough to contribute fully... but someone out there does !
Derek R Bullamore 22:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
A matter of opinion, I suppose, but the BeeGees were an Australian pop band that had their first hit in '66 I think. "Best" is debatable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.253.80.69 (talk) 22:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Easybeats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140707083918/http://www.bcmentertainments.co.uk:80/featured-acts-easybeats.php to http://www.bcmentertainments.co.uk/featured-acts-easybeats.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070911130445/http://www.auspost.com.au/philatelic/stamps/index.asp?link_id=2.389 to http://www.auspost.com.au/philatelic/stamps/index.asp?link_id=2.389
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
"They are regarded as the greatest Australian pop band of the 1960s..."
editThat's an ENORMOUS statement to be making without a single supporting reference! The Bee Gees could easily be considered "...the greatest Australian pop band of the 1960s", so the claim seems dubious to me. Perhaps "considered by many" would be more appropriate? Either way a reference needs to be provided, otherwise the statement will have to change. Furthermore, the claim of them "...echoing the Beatles' success in Britain" is also a pretty big statement to be making without a reference. What does it mean exactly? It could be read to mean that they were as popular as the Beatles, which clearly wasn't the case. I think something needs to change there too. Discussion? FillsHerTease (talk) 03:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Good point! Not sure why I hadn't seen this before... I put tags after this statement in the lede. Ckruschke (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Ckruschke
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Easybeats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.whammo.com.au:80/encyclopedia.asp?articleid=794
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Hostile Audience in Orange?
editWhat happened in Orange ? Why was some of the audience ‘hostile’ enough to stop the contest. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:24A6:BBD8:8BC1:F418 (talk) 02:17, 9 August 2020 (UTC)