Talk:The Day the Clown Cried

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Misty MH in topic To Be released, or not to be...

Book

edit

Should there not be information added to this article or a seperate article about the book? -- mjohnson 20/02/06

Unfinished films

edit

Is the "Unfinished films" category really accurate? The article gives the impression that the movie was finished, but it was never released due to disputes between the original screenwriters and director Jerry Lewis. (Sugar Bear 14:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC))Reply

The shooting was finished, but not the editing. There's only a rough cut for screening purposes; the released version would have been edited differently. Also, there's no music or credits. —Chowbok 22:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removed from Trivia

edit

This:

BBC television broadcast?

edit

A correspondent to the Simon Mayo radio show on BBC Radio 5 Live on Friday 12 September 2008 indicated that he had seen The Day The Clown Died a few years previously late at night on BBC television. Can anyone confirm this? Was this a extract or a full broadcast? Or just a false memory? Jamesbrownontheroad (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Basics

edit

This article contains virtually no in-line citations and many unsourced/unattributed claims, opinions and quotes. 76.23.157.102 (talk) 04:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

So why not pitch in and help convert the older style references very common in older articles to the newer, inline cites we now use? If you have the knowledge and the time, you'd be doing the article and readers a big favor. Sadly, I don't have the expertise on this subject. I'll mark it for my watch pages though and try and come back to it with some references. I'll try if you'll try! OK? LiPollis (talk)

Animaniacs

edit

The short "Hearts of Twilight" sould at least get a mention.

05:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paula Bunion (talkcontribs)

unsafe link?

edit

The link in this article mondo-video.com may be dangerous according to Firefox plugin WOT: 06/08/2012 Google Visiting this site may harm your computer according to Google Safe Browsing. [link] 06/08/2012 Yandex Blacklisted by Yandex Safe Browsing for malware. [link] 79.110.95.2 (talk) 11:48, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads-up. Better to be safe: I've removed the actual link but left in the site name. Caveat surfer. --Seduisant (talk) 14:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The statements needing citations...

edit

I think it's close to time to delete some of the statements still needing citations unless someone's going to find some. The reasons they won't or can't release the film have become urban legends themselves and other subsequent claims about where/how the tapes are stored etc. vary and shouldn't be mentioned in the article without reliable citations. I came here to learn about the film, but have found it to be unreliable information after referencing other sources. I'll leave it to keepers of the article to fix Dancindazed (talk) 06:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Day the Clown Cried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

How is there a 'full plot' when the film hasn't been released, or seen ANYWHERE?

edit

????? Did someone make one up? Find a script? Work in the archival room and sneak it on and write exclusive plot on Wikipedia? If there is a time for a reference for a plot, it is now, with this unreleased movie. Charlr6 (talk) 01:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Quite a few people have seen it over the years, but since it's not generally available, the plot summary is unverifiable. Citations are needed for that section. Jonathunder (talk) 01:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand this ....

edit
It is based on a script of the same name[1] by Joan O'Brien, who had co-written the original script with Charles Denton ten years previously.[2]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.93.233.246 (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply 
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Day the Clown Cried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

biased tenor of this page and deleted addition of content

edit

the main body of this page is biased against Lewis and his participation in this project. when i added content from verifiied sources (articles and quotes from youtube interviews) the content was deleted and i was told it was ‘vandalism’. our responsiblity is to present the full amount of evidence in an unbiased way. it is perfectly allowed to present information in support of the film, and more importantly Lewis’ own words on the subject rather than a third party, seem an obvious need. further, the use of outsize quotes, again seeminly to mock Lewis, make it appear the quotes have outsize importance to the content of the article. Anarchistemma (talk) 15:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A YT interwvie is not a good source. Also we can't support or not support the film. If you can find quotes from a RELIABLE source, then add them, but don't remove quotes that put the movie in a bad light. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMinersClick Here To Talk To Me! 15:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

according to wikipedia accepted sources guidelines “audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third party and be properly cited.”. the documentary company that provided this video are credible and Lewis’ first person testimony are certainly pertinent to the film. I did not remove the quotes. i put them as in-line quotes in keeping with the rest of article. their original formatting, which calls them to particular attention, is presented to ridicule Lewis and the film. Anarchistemma (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Lewis haters

edit

this page has been created to mock and denegrate Lewis personally, and specifically for this project. based on the many discussion subjects on the talk page relating to unsourced statements, unverified information and lack of concrete subject matter, i am not the only one with this opinion. my attempt to add unbiased content was met with threats and bullying. i will add the content again and if it is deleted i will take the matter up with third party arbitration. Anarchistemma (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

?2600:4040:475E:F600:78C3:25C3:412:9A5F (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

To Be released, or not to be...

edit

In the video "The Most Infamous Unreleased Film Might Be Screened in 2024", it says at 19:02 that the NYT said it might be released; but at 19:56 it says the NYT told IndieWire that it's not happening and that they don't have the film. (Is this a correction to the article which has the former but not the latter?)

As one commenter said "What good is the original script anyway if they never got it made?"

How about someone (with permission) release ALL the footage, and see if ANYone can make it gold (or silver, or bronze)?

And—Oh!–where is that cut that was supposedly made of the film that Lewis supposedly kept?

But if the film stock has deteriorated too much by now (or was of low-grade quality to begin with?), then one might suppose that it's moot, anyway.

If the O'Brien family is still holding out after a half century, the question is Why??

Misty MH (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply