Talk:The Closing of the Western Mind

Philosophy: Literature / Science / Religion / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of science
	Philosophy of religion
	Contemporary philosophy

Hostile tone

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page mentions the overall positive response to Freeman's arguments (without quoting any positive reviews) then proceeds to liberally quote a dozen or so dismissive academics' negative reviews in a generally slipshod survey of critical reaction.

To the unsigned above -The book was a work of biased polemic and sloppy research; even describing Freeman as a "classical historian" is too generous. Freeman holds no advanced degrees in the field, does not lecture or research at any accredited university nor publish peer-reviewed work in academic journals.Jonathan f1 (talk) 07:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic