This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Online text
editThis is clearly past copyright, does anyone have an online version of the text which could be added as a link?--Crossmr 04:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- The problem might be that an English translation is not past copyright...XinJeisan 04:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- The only translation is from 1974, so that is still well within copyright. However, what does this reference (Shapira, et al., 150)?????XinJeisan 04:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
first monograph?
editIt seems to me that The Record of Tea is the same subject, but much earlier. Yet this article claims that this book is the first monograph about tea in the world. 64.202.157.11 (talk) 02:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Chajing was written during the Tang dinasty, while Chalu was written during the Song dinasty. Since Tang came before Song, it is impossible that Chalu is earlier than Chajing. Indeed, Chajing was written between 760 and 780 CE, while Chalu was written in 1049 CE (i.e. at least 270 years later).
terminology
editrevision of the terminology,
陸羽Lu Yu (唐代 Tang Dynasty)
《茶經》“Tea Classic”
三卷十章Three Scrolls Ten Chapters
茶經的10章Tea Classic’s ten chapters
- previous terms:
Chapter 1. Origin
Chapter 2. Tea Tools
Chapter 3. Manufacture
Chapter 4. Tea Wares
Chapter 5. Brewing
Chapter 6. Drinking Tea
Chapter 7. Anecdotes
Chapter 8. Places
Chapter 9. Omission
Chapter 10. Diagrams
poem source
editA source citation is needed for the poem by Huangpu Zheng -- for both the original poem and the translation, ideally. I think that the poem should not be included if the source citation is lacking. Tksb (talk) 08:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)