Talk:The Boat Race 1863/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bilorv (talk · contribs) 12:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Infobox

edit
  • The margin of victory is stated to be "15 lengths". I'm no expert in rowing; what does this mean? Is it related to this nautical article: length overall? Is it a specific distance that could also be stated in the article?
    It is the length of the rowing boat, it was roughly translated as the distance covered by a boat at full speed in three seconds but there's nothing reliable about that. I'm stating what the RS state, 15 lengths. It most probably is the nautical article that you linked, but I'm not going to use original research to assume as such. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Background

edit
  • The inline citation for "Dark Blues" is from 2003; is there a citation (or reference in the Bibliography) that shows Oxford were called "Dark Blues" in 1863? Same thing with "Light Blues" and Cambridge.
    Almost certainly, but I'm not sure it's relevant, the background section is intended to give the reader a clue about the event (rather than hoping they've read the mediocre The Boat Race article). The Rambling Man (talk) 21:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Was the race "followed ... worldwide" in 1863? This needs a citation saying it was well-known globally back then, not just an American source from and about 2014.
    Rephrased. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Crews

edit

Race

edit

References

edit
edit
  • No problems.

Lead

edit
  • ... the first time since the 1836 race that the scores were level. — This is not mentioned anywhere else in the article, and doesn't have an inline citation. If it's backed up somewhere in the Bibliography, can it be mentioned under Race as well as in the lead? EDIT: I see the statement comes from page 301 of the MacMichael book; can we have an inline citation there? I also still think it should be mentioned under the Race section. — Bilorv (talk)(contribs) 12:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
    Added more to the end. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  The article is now being placed on hold. — Bilorv (talk)(contribs) 12:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

An excellent and thoroughly conducted review, my thanks. I will aim to get these comments addressed in the next 24 hours or so. Thanks again! The Rambling Man (talk) 13:32, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again, I have a little more work to do on the upfront stuff, but will note it here when I'm done. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Bilorv: I addressed a number of your concerns directly in edits, and have responded to those which I'm either not entirely in agreement with or that may require more discussion. Thanks again for your diligence, and I look forward to continuing with the nomination. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
"broacast" --> "broadcast". Everything else has been resolved. — Bilorv (talk)(contribs) 23:14, 27 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Typo fixed, thanks again. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for responding so quickly. Pass for GA. — Bilorv (talk)(contribs) 09:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the thorough review and helpful comments. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply