Talk:Text-based web browser
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Tedickey in topic Charlotte web browser
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of An image of a page viewed in a web browser and the same page viewed in a text-based browser for comparison. be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Tedickey, why did you remove Textmode?
editIt was not an "advert". It is a text-based web browser that should be included in the list. Gmacar (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- WP:EL; Lists normally doesn't contain software which do not have their own article in this wikipedia. mabdul 13:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Also WP:Notability, etc. Providing only a link to an advertisement isn't a way to convince others that your edit wasn't advertising TEDickey (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- ...and the list is incomplete. Gmacar (talk) 11:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- There are probably more than enough advertisements in Wikipedia. No point in adding more, except for self-promotional purposes. TEDickey (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- WP:Wikipedia is a work in progress: this encyclopedia will never be finished. Write good articles and nobody will hinder you adding the article wikilink. mabdul 12:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- (agreed) TEDickey (talk) 23:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
How can someone compile a text based browser so that it can not be used to automatically or manually download files, just text? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.196.128.37 (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Charlotte web browser
editThat's 4 links sourced to one individual, and has the appearance of a promotional edit. Lists such as this should be (see WP:WTAF) Wikipedia topics rather than a link-farm. TEDickey (talk) 10:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)