Talk:Texas Ethics Commission

United States: Texas / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Controversies Page

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The "controversies" subheading makes sense to include for an enforcement agency. However, a cursory reading of the content (let alone a deep dive into sources) shows that it's written from a point of extreme bias. Use of terms like "victim" to describe people who has been lawfully assessed penalties is inappropriate in this context. The entire subheading reads like it was written by aggrieved targets of enforcement action. I am somewhat familiar with the agency and am working on improving this section to be written from a more objective perspective, but would appreciate assistance! Koshersquid (talk) 19:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree this page has numerous problems, including those noted by koshersquid.

also, it notes that the Texas Ethics Commission was formed in 1991 but "The "Sharpstown scandal" of 1971 stands out as a significant incident in its history." How TEC can be blamed for the Sharpstown scandal happening on its watch when it was created twenty years later is beyond me. Curb energia (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic