Talk:Tenontosaurus

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Tenontosaurus ten-ON-toe-SORE-us

Views on Deinonychus as predator of Tenontosaurus

edit

I agree that I don't think Deinonychus preyed on Tenontosaurus as a co-ordinated pack, nor do I think they would have limited themselves to juveniles. I agree that normally Deinonychus would have avoided adult Tenontosaurus, but if multiple Deinonychus scented the blood of an animal wounded by a larger predator such as Acrocanthosaurus, they may have gathered in large numbers, attracted by this common lure, and afterward engaging in a feeding frenzy, similar to today's sharks and pirhanas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.130.109 (talk) 00:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tenontosaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply